SITEMAP  |  
Your Legal Assistant in Human Resource Management
Special Article

"Harassing Her Made Me Sick!"
by Peter S. Saucier

Imagine yourself as the boss of the Michigan Corrections Department. One of your probation officers develops a peculiar attraction to women lawyers who represent convicts in his charge. Indeed, he is remarkably blunt in expressing his feelings, commenting, "You want me, you know you want me," and asking, "Do you want to ***k?" Some of his harassing behavior even appears in letters to one of the women attorneys. You probably do not need a law degree to figure that you can discipline the rascal – say, suspend him for ten days – without legal risk.

Well, you are wrong. And, I am willing to bet that you cannot guess why, law degree or not. It's that old nemesis that every employer has loved to hate for years – workers compensation.

In the real case (it is a real case), probation officer Tony Daniel developed depression after the suspension. It seems that the cause of the depression was the lack of support from management evidenced by his suspension. Daniel applied for workers' compensation benefits, claiming a work-related mental disability based upon the depression. As difficult as it is to imagine, the trial of Daniel's case consumed four days. The workers compensation magistrate concluded that Daniel was entitled to benefits. In his decision, the magistrate wrote that compensation benefits, "like rain, fall on the just and the unjust alike."

It is tempting to write off the decision as the nonsensical blather of a decision- maker whose cranial logic section sprung a leak, but that would be a mistake. The case was appealed a couple of times, and ended up before the Michigan Court of Appeals. There, two appellate judges allowed Daniel to receive benefits, finding that his status as an unsympathetic and difficult (using the court's own timid description of Daniel's conduct) employee did not disqualify him from receiving benefits.

Most experienced labor and employment lawyers would have missed this question on a final examination, or at least would not have reached the same conclusion as the Michigan Court of Appeals. So, if you did not predict the outcome, don't feel too bad.

December 2001

Kollman & Saucier, P.A., The Business Law Building, 1823 York Road, Timonium, MD 21093   Phone: 410-727-4300
Fax: 410-727-4391   © 1999 - 2010 Kollman & Saucier, P.A. All rights reserved.
Website maintained by Armistead Technologies, Llc.tm

Home | About Us | Services | Frank L. Kollman | Peter S. Saucier
Darrell R. VanDeusen | Clifford B. Geiger | Anthony P. Palaigos | Eric Paltell | Sarah E. Longson
Randi Klein Hyatt | Kelly C. Hoelzer | Michael R. Severino | John S. Bolesta | News
The Employment Brief Newsletter | Current Press Release | Frank Kollman's Blog | Article Synopses | Glossary
Handbook | Quick Clip Archive | HR Forms & Policies | Newsletter Mailing list | Contact Us

The Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act: A Bad Law at a Bad Time
Article by Eric Paltell

Military Caregiver FMLA Leave Modified
Article by Darrell R. VanDeusen

Long Time Coming: Learning the Ropes of E-Verify Rules and Procedures
Article by Darrell R. VanDeusen

EFCA Update- Be Careful What You Wish For In Midterm Elections »

OSHA Releases Final Rule on Crane and Derricks »

DOL Issues Fact Sheet: Break Time for Nursing Mothers under the FLSA »

IRS Only Getting Larger »

Unions Outspending Corporations On Campaign Ads »

DOL Issues Fact Sheet: Break Time for Nursing Mothers under the FLSA »

Finally Some Clarity On Business Associate Agreements »

Most recent Quick Clip file

Signup to get your
monthly Newsletter


Current issues

Kollman & Saucier Again Named One of Maryland's Top Law Firms
MORE ... »